About your Search

20130201
20130228
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2
and our border security. the very next day in the appropriations committee they said bay city were rolling it all back in the sequestration. >> is the border less secure if you are taking taking away our's >> you reduce the number of voters patrol agents i think you can say yes it does affect their ability to keep out illegal migrants and others trying to enter the country. speier paint a very dire picture and you mentioned the threat of terrorism doesn't wait for these kinds of legislative roadblocks. so with all the diminished capability that you describe how can a country not face a greater threat of a terrorist attack under these circumstances? >> and this fiscal environment where we go to sequestration and possible shutdowns and all the rest, always lacking a budget and regular order so we can't effectively manage and plan, we will always put a priority on maintaining the safety of the american people but what that is going to require and the impact people are going to see, and they will build over the next couple of weeks. you won't see it immediately like a shutdown but it will accr
've not heard heard from an economist or read of an economy city said we need to approach this serious economic challenge by reducing spending and generating new revenues. there's no question the articulation of that model is something we have to do. so we do it in the latest times, but also at the same time making investments to grow our economy. we have to reduce spending, so we have to make choices about what we invest in. i'm wondering if you would share thoughts in terms of getting the most bang for buck. what are the kinds of policies while they are engaged in spending, were likely to produce the greatest economic growth in the greatest help to our economy because not all spending is the same. in that regard in particular registry thoughts about infrastructure spending, rebuilding the crumbling infrastructure of our country in the old-fashioned wpa way bush leaves behind an asset that contributes to economic growth and the ability to compete in the global economy can at the same time puts people to work immediately the leaves behind a valuable asset. how does infrastructure relate to econ
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2